Comparison of rectal suppository and intramuscular morphine for management of patients with renal colic referred to the emergency department: A randomized double-blinded controlled trial

نویسندگان

چکیده

Objectives: To compare the analgesic effects of rectal suppository morphine (RSM) with intramuscular (IMM) in patients suffered from renal colic referred to emergency ward (EW).
 Methods: In a controlled, randomized, clinical trial, 74/90 EW between March 2016 and 2017 were randomly enrolled into two groups RSM (10 mg) IMM mg/mL). Vital signs severity pain recorded at admission time (0), 15, 30 60 min after treatment.
 Results: The results showed that there was significant decrease VAS score group compared administration (P˂0.05). Furthermore, no difference vital signs, except heart rate (15 min) respiratory (60 (P˂0.05) side during investigation.
 Conclusion: conclusion, use route had higher efficiency IM relieving colic. Although, decreased rates recorded, values normal range. As well, major complications for each method.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Morphine Suppository versus Indomethacin Suppository in the Management of Renal Colic: Randomized Clinical Trial

Background. Renal colic is a medical emergency due to the rapid onset and devastating nature of its pain. Opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are both used as first-line choices in its management. Aim. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of opioids and NSAIDs in the management of acute renal colic. Methods. One hundred and fifty-eight patients were divided ...

متن کامل

Comparing the effects of pethidine and diclofenac suppository on patients with renal colic in the emergency department

Objective: Renal colic is a common cause of emergency room visits. Due to the spontaneous passage of more than 90% of kidney stones, treatment in the emergency department (ED) is limited to pain control. Analgesics currently used are selected based on physician experiences and various theories from different sources. The aim of this study was to compare the common drugs (pethid...

متن کامل

comparison of haloperidol and midazolam in restless management of patients referred to the emergency department; a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial

background: restless and violent behaviors are common in emergency departments (eds), which need therapeutic interventions in most of the times. the first-generation anti-psychotic drugs are one of the most applicable therapeutic agents in the management of such patients, but their use has some limitations. some studies suggest midazolam as an alternative medicine. therefore, this study was per...

متن کامل

a comparison of teachers and supervisors, with respect to teacher efficacy and reflection

supervisors play an undeniable role in training teachers, before starting their professional experience by preparing them, at the initial years of their teaching by checking their work within the proper framework, and later on during their teaching by assessing their progress. but surprisingly, exploring their attributes, professional demands, and qualifications has remained a neglected theme i...

15 صفحه اول

Intravenous acetaminophen versus morphine sulfate in pain management of acute renal colic: a randomized clinical trial

Objective: The main purpose in the treatment of renal colic patients in emergency department is pain management. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen and morphine sulfate in this regard. Methods: This double blind clinical trial was conducted on >18 years old renal colic patients in need of pain management in emer...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of contemporary medical sciences

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2413-0516', '2415-1629']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v9i1.1316